B. Personal Knowledge of the Navs

10. My knowledge of the PhilNavs is based on the time (you can select more than1)
a. When Foreign missionaries were leading 11 44.0%
b. When Kuya Philip was leading 17 68.0%
c. When Kuya Rely was Leading 5 20.0%
d. When Kuya Wency was leading 8 32.0%
e. The present NLT are leading (Kuya Eseng, Bobot, Danny,Soc) 5 20.0%
Votes so far 25 100.0%
11. As far as the Phil. Navigators as an organization is concerned I am aware of (means I know at least 60% .multiple choices allowed)
a. The relationship it has with the International Navs HQ and other Navs worldwide 15 60.0%
b. The organizational structure 13 52.0%
c. The offices and its functions/activities 7 28.0%
d. The present vision/missions and goals and how it is carried out 15 60.0%
e. The present ministry areas 12 48.0%
f. The present ministry targets (students, professionals, etc.) 16 64.0%
g. What is happening at least in one ministry area 12 48.0%
h. How do they handle the ministry (methods, workers, programs) 12 48.0%
i Some projects/programs of the Navs 13 52.0%
j Some staffs 18 72.0%
i Classification of staff and expectations from each classification. 5 20.0%
j How they recruit and handle the staff (recruitment, development, termination) 5 20.0%
k The plans/desire for its alumni 7 28.0%
l The Financial status 5 20.0%
m. I need to add on the choices and explain more (Please write your explanation on the voice out box.) 0 0.0%
Votes so far 25 100.0%
12 My perception of the PhilNavs (do not check if at least you don’t perceive it at 70% level, you can have multiple answers)
a. I feel that Navigators is still playing a unique role in the Kingdom. 23 88.5%
b. I feel that Navigators as organization is clear on its vision. 16 61.5%
c. I feel that the Navs has an effective organizational structure. 9 34.6%
d. I feel that the leadership is able to stir the organization towards the vision. 10 38.5%
e. I feel that the PhilNavs is doing its ministry according to its vision (doing the right thing) 11 42.3%
f. I feel that the PhilNavs is doing the ministry correctly. (right method) 9 34.6%
g. I feel that the PhilNavs is concern about their staff. 9 34.6%
h. I feel that the PhilNavs is run professionally. 8 30.8%
i I feel that the PhilNavs has a healthy relationship. 11 42.3%
j I feel that PhilNavs is running with integrity. 14 53.8%
k. I feel that the PhilNavs is concern with its alumni. 10 38.5%
l I feel that PhilNavs is adequately funded. 2 7.7%
m I have more perceptions, I want to explain (Use the voice out box) 2 7.7%
Votes so far 26 100.0%
13. My perception of the Navstaff. (the word “most” is near 80% level and “some” is near 20% level, you can have multiple answers)
a. I feel that most of them are really called by God. 21 91.3%
b. I feel that most of them are gripped with the a vision. 13 56.5%
c. I fell that the staff are united in pursuing the vision.. 11 47.8%
d. I feel that most of them sincerely love people and the ministry. 18 78.3%
e. I feel that most of the staff have good interpersonal and working relationships 11 47.8%
f. I feel that some are in the staff because they have little chance of finding a job. 3 13.0%
g. I feel that some are doing the ministry/loving people because they are staff (out of duty) 3 13.0%
h. I feel that some are NOT working hard enough. 2 8.7%
i. I feel that some staff have relegated the ministry work to the volunteer student leaders 3 13.0%
j. I feel that some lack integrity. 2 8.7%
k. I feel that some lack professionalism. 3 13.0%
l. I feel that most of them are good example of character and faith. 15 65.2%
m. I feel that some of them do not understand what they are doing. 1 4.3%
o I feel that some are living luxuriously, have high living standard. 0 0.0%
p. I feel that some enjoy being a staff because they are more relax 0 0.0%
q I feel that some staffs are manipulative. 2 8.7%
r I feel that some staffs relate to me because of financial support. 0 0.0%
s I have more perceptions of the staff, I want to explain. (Use the voice out box) 1 4.3%
Votes so far 23 100.0%

SOME COMMENTS ON THE SURVEY

You can read it from the bottom up.

Friday, April 3, 2009

The Acts 2 Model

First, I would like to take the chance to send my greetings to Oxy, especially kon ulay man pud diay ka as you are so candid:) Seems like you'll be with us forever kay si Rene ni submit na man:)
Abi nimo R.G. naa na jud koy gisulat few weeks ago when I woke up one day, clear kaayo akong mind and I rushed to type them in pero wa nako ma send and at the end of the day I accidentally close it without saving. I just couldn't retrieve the thoughts and could not replay the moment. what a waste!
awat ko ani ni oxy..below are my worthless thoughts on the finance issue at this point..
Bahin sa pangutana ni Oxy kon asa ang mga staff in the survey preparation. .maybe somebody else has to answer her kay wa gani ko kabalo nga kini si R.G.. dili man diay staff:).
However, as to the objective of the survey.. I mentioned having a survey or something to base our future/immediate engagement to this issue. That was because of R.G.'s comment not only once in this egroup but the last time noted was on the 27th of February he wrote..
".. I think we from Cebu navs, God has raised many committed workers, working full-time in the ministry and willing to risk to mission fields both locally and overseas, but we are also not very good in terms of giving... "
I took the first part of the phrase as a compliment/strength worthy of praises to the Lord. The second part is somehow expected as a weakness that needs to be addressed through the survey. Based on the result, the last 2 questions are critical.. it shows that givers appreciate the sincerity of the partnership as not only when the person is actively supporting financially but as prayer partners first. The giving plan is generally based on the need seen and the personal relationship. I hope the survey will give the staffs and leadership some ideas in what really matters to donors and how the donors appropriate their giving.
I am aware that this will not be easy because the Navs has its own structure and ways of running the ministry. However, if we and the leadership are open to the alumni's or outsiders' (not a staff) ideas of running our local affairs i.e. cebunavs then we in this egroup could step in and take care of our own concerns as a group.
As Edd suggested, we can set up a Local Investment Fund to support needy staffs and other emergency concerns. And I agree that it should have to be managed well and have transparency in how it is being appropriated. . Based on what I learned from this exchange.. I could say, it doesn't make sense and not morally right to see a staff hardly surviving. How could we let this go on??
On the other hand, it is not enough to ask people to give or criticize them for not giving or for giving reasons not to give. I believe this is a group of generous people. In fact, we need to celebrate that cebunavs is on target of what the ministry is all about.. raising committed laborers for His harvest!!
The Acts 2 model of believers working together is worth emulating. Each one of us in this egroup is an asset to the ministry with unique set of gifts. Some may not have cash but have time. Some may not have the luxury of time but have a special talent or have a great network connection. Anyway, there's a lot of potentials this egroup is sitting on and we could utilize them. Each one's contribution to the Kingdom is valuable in God's economy. We just need creativity and teamwork to turn this into a tangible outcome.
My out of the box idea is to have a paid staff to relieve the burden of fund raising. At least a base/living allowance! This in turn will encourage new graduates to continue serving the ministry while waiting or looking for a job considering they don't have the experience to raise funds. But, there should be a different criteria for the paid from the unpaid.
Another avenue is to expand the carenderia investment that was started already or some sort of business venture that everybody could take part.
uyy, taas na man..
Blessings to all of you,
Ruby

No comments:

Post a Comment